This work aims to specify the content and scope of impartiality in evidentiary matters. The complexity of the issue lies in the fact that the judge is required to assume knowledge of the facts in an unprepared manner, without having a established hypothesis about how the events occurred before instructing the process, but in practice it is undeniable that he is exposed to the media influence, to his prejudices drawn from previous cases and even to the feelings that the parties in trial arouse in him. It is proposed, then, that the judge, to be impartial, must always start from a cognitive state of ignorance regarding the facts stated by the parties, and thus obtain his state of certainty by contrasting these a priori with the flow of information obtained in the instruction of the process, in such a way that the facts can only be considered proven, after weighing the evidentiary acts brought to the judicial process.
eBook
Impreso
-
-
Fredy Hernando Toscano López
-
Abogado de la Universidad Externado de Colombia, conciliador extrajudicial en derecho, especialista en Derecho Procesal de la Universidad Externado de Colombia, master oficial en Derecho Privado de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Doctor en Derecho Suma Cum Laudem. Docente e investigador del Departamento de Derecho Procesal
-
eBook
Digital: descarga y online - EPUB
Catálogo Universidad Externado:
Impreso
Catálogo Universidad Externado:
Facultad
Categoría
